<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shut up, Canice &#187; Webosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.caniceleung.com/category/webosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.caniceleung.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 07:22:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>About Yahoo!soft</title>
		<link>http://blog.caniceleung.com/2008/02/about-yahoosoft/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.caniceleung.com/2008/02/about-yahoosoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>caniceleung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webosphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.caniceleung.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that I claim to be a tech expert or write for Wired or anything (sigh), but&#8230;
Why the hell wouldn&#8217;t Microsoft just sink a third of that cost into revamping its horrible search engine/web portal rather than attempt to buy up another horrible search index that&#8217;s stretched itself too thin with a million mediocre features? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I claim to be a tech expert or write for Wired or anything (sigh), but&#8230;</p>
<p>Why the hell wouldn&#8217;t Microsoft just sink a third of that cost into revamping its horrible search engine/web portal rather than attempt to buy up another horrible search index that&#8217;s stretched itself too thin with a million mediocre features? They might have a fighting chance if they hired some decent developers (and a marketing team too, while they&#8217;re at it).</p>
<p>Buying up more shitty search engines a la destroy and conquer isn&#8217;t going to work. As Google — which buys up innovative, genuinely cool start-ups and adds them to its mix rather than just eat up the competition — evolves and adapts to the real needs of web users, their slice of the market pie is only going to get bigger. Better take a hint, Ballmer.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.caniceleung.com%2F2008%2F02%2Fabout-yahoosoft%2F&amp;linkname=About%20Yahoo%21soft"><img src="http://blog.caniceleung.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.caniceleung.com/2008/02/about-yahoosoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

